When the fight between the two companies becomes this intense, they always try to outdo each other, making the products better. The hard part about this whole disaster is choosing the right product. However, one could call this a matter of luxury as it probably wouldn’t matter as both are excellent products in their own right.
To put it in the context of real world selection, choosing the right CPU chip is like finding a roulette strategy that gives you the best odds of winning. There are pros and cons to any such strategy as shown at roulettestrategy.com/en-in/ for example, but making the right decision always boils down to what you want from the strategy. However, the best option for you is a 50/50 chance and it takes time to find it.
To provide more clarity to the whole “CPU Wars” case, let’s try to show some of the strengths and weaknesses with each manufacturer so you can use that and make an informed opinion yourself.
In the beginning, when people on a PC on a budget were choosing a CPU that offered a lot of bang for the buck, the easy option was to use AMD. Intel has always been considered a bit expensive until now. AMD has increased prices this time around, and its position as a budget pick has gotten less true over the years.
The price of the latest generation Ryzen AMD has gone up quite a bit and is now on the same level as Intel. For example, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, which is AMD’s most expensive unit, costs £580. However, you really get what you pay for, it might be expensive, but it’s very worth it. If one is on a budget, there is an affordable Ryzen model, the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 and the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X. This will cost you £79 and £100 respectively, which is a huge difference.
For Intel, you’ll find a lower price point for similar processors known as Coffee Lake Refresh. In the latest generation of these processors, which include the i9-9900K, you can expect to pay £420 per spinner. If you’re looking to get a little cheaper but still have a worthwhile chip in this line, you can opt for the Core i7-10700K, which will save you £300.
For those who want the best and are also willing to pay for it, you might want to consider AMD’s 3rd generation ThreadRipper. These are primarily aimed at filmmakers, data scientists, and people who work with advanced animation and 3D modeling. So what will drive this scene? Well, a small fortune. The Threadripper 3990X costs £3030. This may be out of reach for the average player, but if you can afford it and need it, it will do wonders for you.
Now that we’ve figured out how much a few different processors will cost you, and you’ve had the opportunity to budget a bit more, let’s talk performance. It’s worth noting here: This is an area in which AMD and Intel have been very close. The thing that determines your choice will most likely be playing games with the highest graphics or if you prefer the ability to multitask better.
One of the things to remember with AMD is that a limited number of their CPUs have integrated graphics, something that can be a deciding factor when choosing your CPU.
The CPUs we talked about earlier, the Ryzen 3 3100 and 3 3300X, provide solid performance for mid-range gaming. If you want to take it to the next level, we recommend Ryzen 9 with a dedicated GPU.
Intel has already integrated Intel HD, so mainstream games will be playable without problems. You will also be able to stream high quality videos easily without buying anything extra, no matter what CPU you decide to land on. However, similar to the case of AMD, if you want to play at the next level in terms of quality, you will also need a dedicated GPU.
After Intel released the Coffee- and Ice Lake processor, we can conclude that each CPU will outperform AMD’s Ryzen and Threadripper on per-core performance, even if by a hairline.
The CPU wars aren’t coming to an end, it seems like things are just getting started, and we’re clearly in good hands. With the healthy rivalry between AMD and Intel, we can only expect bigger products for the future as they will constantly try to outdo each other.